The Difference of the Theoretical Approach of Corporate Social Responsibility Between the European Union and United States of America

Wahiba Mokadem; Bishr Muhamed Muwafak

doi:10.51325/ijbeg.v4i1.22

, Articles

The Difference of the Theoretical Approach of Corporate Social Responsibility Between the European Union and United States of America

Articles

https://doi.org/10.51325/ijbeg.v4i1.22

Published 2021-01-31

Wahiba Mokadem⁺⁻
Bishr Muhamed Muwafak⁺⁻

Wahiba Mokadem

University of Abdelhamid Ben Badis / Faculty of Economic, Commercial, Financial and Management Sciences; Mostaganem; Algeria

Bishr Muhamed Muwafak

Applied Science University, Sitra, Bahrain

PDF

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR); Implicit Corporate Social Responsibility; Explicit Corporate Social Responsibility; The American Approach, The European Approach.

How to Cite

Mokadem, W. and Muwafak, B. M. (2021) “The Difference of the Theoretical Approach of Corporate Social Responsibility Between the European Union and United States of America”, International Journal of Business Ethics and Governance, 4(1), pp. 124-136. doi: 10.51325/ijbeg.v4i1.22.

Abstract

The experiences of countries that relate to corporate social responsibility differ greatly, and the reason for these differences is due to several reasons, including: the economic, social, and cultural policies of the country, the degree of government intervention in corporate activity, and the degree to which governments cover societal needs. Therefore, we find a difference between the theoretical approaches to social responsibility in both European countries and the USA. This research aims to explain these two approaches, by looking at each approach in an analytical manner and then deducing the differences between them, and this is to give an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of each approach and highlight their significant contributions.

https://doi.org/10.51325/ijbeg.v4i1.22

PDF

References

Almugharbel, N., & Fouad, Y. (2008). The social responsibility of capital in Egypt: some international experiences. The Egyptian Center for Economic Studies, Egypt. (in Arabic)

Atallah Bashir Al-Nuwaiqa. (2016). The impact of business ethics and social responsibility in enhancing skills in commercial banks operating in the Makkah region. Journal of Studies (Administrative Sciences), 43(1). (in Arabic)

Capron, M. (2006). Une vision européenne des différences USA/Europe continentale en matière de RSE :pourquoi la RSE en Europe est un objet politique et non pas éthique,. le séminaie intenational de Montréal sue la RSE.

Conseil des barreaux de l'union Européenne (CCBE). (2008). la responsabilité des entreprises et le role de la pofession Européens. guide a l'attention des avoratsEuropéens, Bruxelles.

Meraas Management Consulting Center. (2010). Liberalizing the concept of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility Development Series, Social Responsibility Council in Riyadh, Riyadh, KSA. (in Arabic)

Monti, N. (2016). Comment les entreprises Américains conçoivent-elles la RSE. Retrieved 5 13, 2020, from Youmatter: https://youmatter.world/fr/rse-etats-unis-usa-reglementation-differences-france/

Muhammad Al-Sayrafi. (2007). Management social responsibility. Alexandria, Egypt: Alwafa world of printing and publishing. (in Arabic)

Promouvoir un cade européen pour la esponsabilité sociale des entreprises. (2010). Consulté le 1 13, 2011, sur SENAT: www.senat.fr/ue/pac/E1776.html

Rodié, I. (2007). Responsabilité sociale des entreprises-le développement d'un cadre européen;. mémoire présenté pour l'obtention du diplôme d'étude européennes, Genève.

Saadeh Iman , and Khalidi Raja. (2019). The reality of Palestinian corporate social responsibility and ways to direct it towards supporting social development. Palestine: The Palestinian Economic Research Institute (MAS). (in Arabic)

Salah Al-Sharnoubi. (1999). Organization and management in the business sector (introduction to social responsibility). Egypt: Alexandria Book Center. (in Arabic)