Bahrain government sector organizations have started to realize the significance of team management and how it can be managed effectively and efficiently to ensure enhancing the organization's performance. The use of team management to enhance organizational performance in the Bahrain government sector has become a serious situation for the government in the Kingdom of Bahrain. However, in spite of the increasing number of studies relating to team management in developed countries, few studies have been made in the same context within gulf countries. The aim of this study is to determine how the factors of team management can affect the performance of government organizations in the Kingdom of Bahrain. The study adopted a quantitative method approach for the purpose of the study. The sample size of the study is selected from Bahrain government sector organizations, data were collected from 150 respondents, and the sample was selected based of those who were working for the government and semi-government organizations from the employees who are representing the basics of the organization to the managers who are the responsible persons of team’s formation. The generated data from the government and semi-government organizations were analyzed using many statistical tools, we used the Correlation analysis to test the relationship between our variables and Linear Regression was to test the hypothesis of the study. The results showed that only team decision has a significant positive influence on organizational performance in Bahrain government sector. However, the study result showed that there is no influence on organizational performance in the Bahrain government sector from team trust, team motivation, team cohesiveness, and job satisfaction. Finally, the study recommended the need for Bahrain government sector organizations to give full attention to team management in those organizations in which this will reflect the organizational performance positively.
Barrick, M. R., Bradley, B. H., Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Colbert, A. E. (2007). The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Academy of Management journal, 50(3), 544-557. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25525781
Becker, W.S., and Mathieu, J. (2003). Team performance, in Edwards, J.E., Scott, C. and Raju, N.S.(Eds), The Human Resources Program Evaluation Handbook, Sage Publications, CA, 285-300.
Billy T.W. Yu, W.M. To, Peter K.C. Lee (2012). Quality management framework for public management decision making. School of Business, Macao Polytechnic Institute, Macao, The People’s Republic of China. Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, The People’s Republic of China.
Blanchard, K., Carlos. J. P., & Randolf, A. (1996). Empowerment takes more than a minute. Wiley: California.
Blund, B. E., &Spring, K. A. (1991). MPA Graduates and the Dilemma of Job Satisfaction: Does Crossing the Sector Line Make a Difference Public Personnel Management, 20 (4),449-455. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609102000406
Cannella Jr, A. A., Park, J. H., & Lee, H. U. (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Academy of management Journal, 51(4), 768-784. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.33665310
Chidambaram, L. (1996). Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 143-166. https://doi.org/10.2307/249476
Chowdhury, S. (2005). Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: is it important Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6),727-746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.07.001
Cianni, M., & Wnuck, D. (1997). Individual growth and team enhancement: Moving toward a new model of career development. Academy of Management Perspectives, 11(1), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1997.9707100663
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of management, 23(3), 239-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300303
Emmert, M. A., & Taher, W. A. (1992). Public sector professionals: The effects of public sector jobs on motivation, job satisfaction and work involvement. The American Review of Public Administration, 22(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409202200103
Heffron, F. A. (1989). Organization Theory and Public Organizations: the Political Connection. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hung, S. J. (2003). Organizational conflicts and responsive communication strategies: A study of a Taiwanese diplomatic organization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of La Verne, California.
Kaboolian, L. (1996). How do public managers manage? Bureaucratic constraints, organizational culture, and the potential for reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Gibson, C. B., Tesluk, P. E., & McPherson, S. O. (2002). Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(3), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2002.8540322
Lachman, R. (1985). Public and private sector differences: CEOs' perceptions of their role environments. Academy of management journal, 28(3), 671-680. https://doi.org/10.5465/256122
Larson, C., & LaFasto, F. (1989). Teamwork: what must go right, what must go wrong. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lee, S. H., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Su, B., & Liu, X. (2006). Understanding the dimensions of virtual teams. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(4), 507-523.
Levine, J. M., & Moreland. (1976). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.003101
McAllister, D. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59. https://doi.org/10.2307/256727
Paine, F. T., Carroll Jr, S. J., & Leete, B. A. (1966). Need satisfactions of managerial level personnel in a government agency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50(3), 247. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023422
Samuel, E. (2004). Racism in peer-group interactions: South Asian students' experiences in Canadian academe. Journal of College Student Development, 45(4), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2004.0053
Siegel, M. (1996). Reinventing management in the public sector. Federal Probation[Electronic version], 60 (1), 30-35.
Simon, Cary Alan (1998), Organizational performance in the public sector: A comparison of 77 federal bureaus receiving or not receiving the presidents quality award 1992-1997. United States International University, USA.
Srivastava, Mohit; Rogers, Helen; Lettice, Fiona. team performance management: past, current and future trends. Team Performance Management 19.7/8 (2013): 352-362. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-04-2013-0009
Straus, A., & Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ting, Y. (1997). Determinants of job satisfaction of federal government employees. Public personnel management, 26(3), 313-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609702600302
Todaro, M. P. (1996). Economic Development. Reading, Mass. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
Wageman, R. (2010). Interdependence and group effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 145-180. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393703
Wegge, J., Schmidt, K. H., & Hoch, J. (2009). Goal setting: Basic findings and new developments at the team level. In Industrial engineering and ergonomics (pp. 245-254). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01293-8_19
Weiss, H. M., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota. https://doi.org/10.1037/t05540-000
Wheelan, S. (1999). Creating effective teams: A guide for members and leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wise, L. R. (1999). The Public Service Culture.” In Stillman, R. J. (eds.), Public Administration: Concepts and Cases. 342-353. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Wittmer, D. (1991). Serving the People or Serving for Pay: Reward Preferences Among Government, Hybrid Sector, and Business Managers. Public Productivity and Management Review, 14(4), 369-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380953
Zajac, G., & Al-Kazemi, A. (1997). Reinventing government and redefining leadership: Implications for personnel management in government. Public Productivity & Management Review, 372-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380678
Zand, D.E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229-239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393957
Zikmund, W., Babin, B (2006 ). Exploring Marketing Research (9th International edition). Ohio – Thomson South-Western.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Array